Lifelogging and Identity in the Metaverse
One of the great things about lifelogging is that it takes a bunch of data that formerly had been in the hands only of companies and the government, if anyone, and puts it back in the hands of the individual. At the moment, Amazon.com knows enough about me to recommend Infotopia, but unless I care to do some clumsy screen-scraping, what I buy on Amazon stays on Amazon; there’s no way for me to combine that Amazon data with a Netflix history and my Zappos purchases to build a more detailed profile of myself. That’s a shame, but we’re now approaching the point when something like that should soon be possible. Already, there are services and applications out there that can record my browsing history in more or less detail, including stuff like Google History, Justin Hall’s Passively Multiplayer Online Game, Slife, Me.dium and several others. Me.dium, in fact, has been able to leverage the attention data flowing through its Firefox plugin into a $15 million Series B round of funding. This very perceptive blog post (which is excellently titled — and from which I’ve stolen the image above) starts to get at why lifelogging services like Me.dium could become very valuable as the broader metaverse takes shape: “Me.dium’s technology, by tracking people’s behavior, could become valuable to advertisers looking for more ways to target ads.”
To some elderly browsers of the Web — i.e., anyone over 30 — this might seem alarming. But the evidence, both anecdotal and empirical, is that the coming generation of Web users values the ability to make this kind of information about themselves available, not only to receive ads for things they might actually like, but also to help them filter for people and content they might enjoy as well. A while back, when I was reporting this story on Virtual Laguna Beach, I had the chance to talk with Jeffrey Cole, director of the Center for the Digital Future at the University of Southern California, who had just released USC’s sixth annual survey of the impact of the Internet. According to Cole, almost half of American Internet users consider their lives online as important as anything that happens in the physical world. And in teen communities, he reports, the line between the real and virtual is especially blurred. “This is who they really are,” Cole told me. “When they go online, it’s ‘This is who I am, this is who I want to meet, this is what I like, now see if you can be my friend.’”
This is who I am. What’s interesting to me (and pardon me if I’ve written about this too often before) is how well that describes so much of what goes on in social networking sites these days. MySpace seems to me to be more about identity-building than it is about linking up with friends. Or rather, the identity-building seems to be a necessary precursor to the networking piece. What’s interesting about things like Me.dium is that they provide you with the raw material to build an identity online. The history of my interactions with sites like Amazon, Zappos, Netflix and all the rest — including what’s logged by Last.fm, and by me in places like Twitter — could be used to generate some kind of profile of myself that, theoretically, I’d be able to control and which would be useful in a variety of situations.
One way to implement that would be through an emerging standard known as APML, which I first heard about from Sebastian Kupers of the German-language blog pixelsebi, who reports that the Inworld Advertising Network (IAN) he helps manage — which sells ad space on more than 700 billboards in more than 50 regions in the virtual world of Second Life — has joined the Attention Profiling Mark-up Language workgroup. The APML workgroup is developing a standard format for specifying attention data — i.e., information about what you’ve been looking at on the Web, or, in the workgroup’s words, “a portable file format containing a description of ranked user interests.” That word “portable” is key. Kupers envisions being able to access such files in a place like Second Life, and the IAN is also developing a tool to record attention data in-world. That data could then be exported and made part of the APML file generated by your Web-based activities. Of course, as the IAN blog post points out, there are some limitations of Second Life that prevent all this from running as smoothly as it should.
Nevertheless, the idea is sound, both for Second Life and for the Web. Devising a system that lets users control a portable APML file — i.e., a profile of themselves that’s generated automatically as they go about their business on the Web or in SL — could help open up all kinds of possibilities. One nice thing about it is that it would allow users to decide when they wanted to apply such a filter and when they wanted to be left alone. In any case, it will be interesting to see how APML develops, and whether it can gain any traction. Users don’t always want the job of controlling their personal data, but if APML can help them have more options in that area, it can only be a good thing. It’s also something that begins to prove the value of lifelogging, which is still a foreign concept to most people.



Along with recording my browsing history (which I usually have turned off) I think one of the really interesting aspects of what Me.dium offers 2D web surfers is that it makes the net less of an isolated experience over all.
You can have conversations about a specific page you are looking at with others who are viewing the same page thus adding new layer of content to the “page”. As this type of technology progresses the future is going to be interesting for developers & brands that have a stranglehold around their content and message. e.g. product reviews in the sidebar connected to a page on the manufactures site which they have no control over sidebar content.
[…] Since the beginning we’ve been alone online. Me.dium is trying to show you what you already know: there are people around you on the internet, doing the same things, reading the same blogs, searching for the same things.
It’s really no different to what you do in the real world everyday. When you walk downtown, you don’t wear a disguise. Usually, people go to where other people are. Whether it’s to follow the crowd, or bump into friends, generally people have always preferred to be around people than to be alone. […] Kimbal Musk CEO Me.Dium http://me.dium.com/node/274
Prove what value?
I’ll admit to being someone who doesn’t get lifelogging. What are you saying, Walker- that you want Amazon to be able to recommend Anne Rice books to you because you watch a lot of homoerotic vampire movies off netflix? Or that you want everyone to know about it? Or that you always forget what you like and want a website full of cookie data to remind you?
What are you going to do when your whole day is filled with targeted recommendations for new movies, music, books and battery operated toys? How are you going to discover anything new when all your time is absorbed just reading through the list of stuff your global lifelog aggregator decided you’d want to see? How are you going to converse with anyone when the only news you read is tailored exactly- I mean *exactly* to your specific prejudices?
It seems horribly insular.
I’ve always liked the idea of “reading along together” though- live chat with other people browsing the same website is cool. Though I’m not sure how I’d feel about those people being able to three-click to a flickr collection of my sister’s wedding photos if I was browsing literotica, or even Violet Blue’s blog at the time.
people are stranger
yes… eventually “lifeblogging” will hopefully go the way of “push media”
just another WIRED coverstory to be laughed at over beers in a bar( real and 3dweb based) sometime in the next few years…
so i hope.;)
cube3