SL Shopping Site Relaunched With Metadata

I just found out that SLBoutique, a Web-based shopping site for Second Life objects, has been relaunched with a new look and new functionality. The relaunch comes courtesy of the Electric Sheep Company (a sponsor of this blog), the virtual world services firm that bought SLBoutique some months back. SLB is one of a handful of sites that let SL users browse and purchase in-world items via the Web. Others include SLExchange, and Second Server, plus a few others I’ve no doubt forgotten or haven’t discovered yet. How significant is the SLB relaunch? Well, the site certainly is easier to use and look at, but it’s the new functionality that will make the difference. Or at least, will begin to.
Web-based shopping sites were one of the early add-on apps that residents created for SL, only because the native search functionality of the virtual world is deeply broken. Linden Lab’s initial vision for their world left out the ability to make information available to a large number of people in an organized fashion, or to somehow incorporate the Web (where that’s easy to do) into the task. This is being rectified now, as LL struggles to bring a Mozilla browser into the environment in a meaningful way. But there’s still a long way to go.
The best thing about the SLB relaunch is that it helps push tagging into the mix of Second Life. On the new site, vendors can now tag their objects, and shoppers can search by tag. Of course, this is only as reliable as its users. (One of the most popular of the new tags is apparently “footware.”) But it gives users a new layer of control and a new lens through which to filter what they’re browsing. Those things are important in making sites like SLB more useful and easier to navigate, and keeping them from being what they’ve more or less been thus far: a pile of stuff that was difficult to sort through, like the bargain bins in the basement of a discount department store. You can also now see lists of Hot Tags, Most Popular Tags (how is that different?), Most Populat Items, New Items, Top Sellers and Recent Sales, and there’s even an RSS feed to let you know when new items are posted, which I think is very cool.
No offense is meant here to FlipperPA Peregrine, who originally built the site. SLB — which actually debits your SL account and delivers the object before you’ve even logged into SL — was a great advance when it first hit the Web. The idea of tagging objects and places in Second Life has been a long time coming. When LL began building its world, tagging was not the Web-based darling it’s since become. Nor are LL’s developers big Web-heads, I’m told. Brilliant designers and programmers, yes; deep into Web-based processes, apparently not.
Still, the concept of a metadata layer is almost entirely missing from Second Life, and that’s a big drawback. It’s great to see users bringing it into the world now that the API is slowly becoming a bit more open. There’s still no way to store metadata within SL, though. (Adding a “meta” field to SL objects and locations would be great! LL, are you listening?) But adding tags to SLBoutique is a small step toward some kind of Web-based solution. Generalized SL search is another problem that residents have attempted to tackle on the Web in a number of ways. SLB’s tags should help push all of this gradually forward, only because they finally give residents something search on, and in a context — shopping — that people will actually use.



Mark, your suggestion to add a “metadata layer” is a good one. Right now though, I’d settle for the ability to access all of the existing datafields. You can’t pull Description and Price for items in an object, which strikes me as a good first step.
This has been a little frustrating as I’ve been trying to create my own answer to the “..native search functionality of the virtual world is deeply broken.” issue, with Second411.com
slhandbook.com, run by Clubside Granville, a new resident, is also working on this kind of “yellow pages” function.
The “no offense” comment here doesn’t make sense. FlipperPA’s resume appears to be rich in web applications and data base management. Are you saying that he didn’t work on this new tagged thingie? But though he sold the site, he remains associated with it, and he’s on the staff of ESC. So what, you’re saying this tagging improvement happened directly as a result of ESC buying out Flipper? But ESC *is* Flipper and Flipper *is* ESC.
I personally am still trying to understand all the fluff and froth about tags. Tags seem pretty inane to me. They add layers of work and they may satisfy some inner human need to list and classify which we’ve all had ever since we collected stamps or listed all our toys in dime store notebooks, but…do people ever look at the tag lists? That’s what I wonder. The tags often seem to broad as to be unusable. Presing on them, I get…a face full of junk I have to sort through. I’d much have a very sturdy Google type search engine in which I can type “dress, little black” and pull up an exact item and vendor like that.
What I meant was, no offense should be taken by Flipper when I say the new site is easier to use and look at than his original design, and the fact that the original didn’t have tagging. Yes, I’m assuming Flipper did work on the redesigned site.